Canadian Law Courts Case Study.

Name of case and docket Buksa, Ray vs. fair weather Toyota Padamsey, cut Etal Date of trial February 13, 2003 Courtroom number #264 Name of supply D.G. Ingram Names and occupations of all witnesses No witnesses at trial What did the plaintiff sue for? $3000.00 Assessment for damages What was the suspects defense? The locomotive installed in Mr. Buksas Toyota was properly installed and at not fault of fair weather Toyota did the railway locomotive neglectdown. Did the defendant make a claim against the plaintiff? If so, what for? No counterclaim was made by the defendant. Summarize the facts and the evidence of the plaintiff, the defendant and other witnesses The plaintiff Mr Buksa had an engine installed at Sun Toyota, the engine was a rebuilt engine. The rebuilt engine broke down after 3 months and was only on a lower floor warrant by Sun Toyota for 30 days. Mr. Buksa learned that the engine was not installed properly and hence that was the cause of the engine break down. Sun Toyota would not comply with Mr. Buksas plea of installing or fixture the engine without charge. This continued for over 10 months. Did the parties flummox lawyers? If so what did they do? The defendant Sun Toyota had a lawyer gibe them in this matter. The lawyer took the case on the gradient of Sun Toyota and basically was Suns voice at the trial. Describe the role of the approximate. Did s/he get involved or remain upstage? Give examples. The judge heard the evidence from both parties. The judge took control and made sure both parties understood the sureness fully. The judge also found a solution to the slickness he was presented with. In the case, the defendants lawyer was ill informed and thereof another court date was finally agreed to. What was the role... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full es say, visit our page: cheap essay